Mensaje
De
03/07/2008 15:57:41
a
03/07/2008 13:16:36
General information
Foro:
News
Category:
Miscellaneous
ID de la conversación:
01326977
ID del mensaje:
01328843
Views:
9
>>>>Of course not. I don't know about the US, but the cases of home invasion in Canada is pretty low. I'm pretty sure that the risks that pose a loaded gun in a house is much higher than the risk of being rapped/killed/tortured/etc. in a house invasion.
>>>
>>>How many houses in the US have a loaded gun in them. 500,000? More (I'd bet).
>>
>>I think I read somewhere that something over 30% of homes in the U.S. have at least one gun.
>>
>>Have a look at this:
>>http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/2007-releases/press01112007.html
>
>Note that criminals were used in ALL of the instances of homicide. Ban murderers.
Because they use criminals? Ban criminals instead.
Um... could you explain first how does one use a criminal (criminal what?)?
back to same old
the first online autobiography, unfinished by design
What, me reckless? I'm full of recks!
Balkans, eh? Count them.
>>>
>>>How many houses in the US have a loaded gun in them. 500,000? More (I'd bet).
>>
>>I think I read somewhere that something over 30% of homes in the U.S. have at least one gun.
>>
>>Have a look at this:
>>http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/2007-releases/press01112007.html
>
>Note that criminals were used in ALL of the instances of homicide. Ban murderers.
Because they use criminals? Ban criminals instead.
Um... could you explain first how does one use a criminal (criminal what?)?
back to same old
the first online autobiography, unfinished by design
What, me reckless? I'm full of recks!
Balkans, eh? Count them.