Message
From
08/03/2010 15:13:05
To
08/03/2010 15:07:52
Miscellaneous
ID da thread:
01451553
ID da mensagem:
01453279
Views:
39
>Yes, it was real sloppy by the scientists who did it.
>
>Mike, if you think it was merely being sloppy, I think there's a great deal more you need to read. This was intellectual corruption. Care to hear some facts?
I am not disputing the facts of what happened there. Wanting a particular conclusion, of course, is the opposite of proper scientific method. That doesn't mean the conclusion is wrong.
>
>Mike, if you think it was merely being sloppy, I think there's a great deal more you need to read. This was intellectual corruption. Care to hear some facts?
I am not disputing the facts of what happened there. Wanting a particular conclusion, of course, is the opposite of proper scientific method. That doesn't mean the conclusion is wrong.