Message
From
31/03/2010 19:11:55
Neil Mc Donald
Cencom Systems P/L
The Sun
,
Australia
To
31/03/2010 10:41:44
Jake Schneider
California
,
United States
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Articles
Title:
Re:
Climategate Whitewash #1
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01458204
Message ID:
01458272
Views:
44
What else would you expect, their livelyhoods depend on the farce continuing.
>The first official inquiry into Climategate has produced the first whitewash, as expected.
>
http://climateresearchnews.com/2010/03/mps-climategate-report-published-whitewash-with-dissent/
>
>CRU is "criticized" for repeated violations of the FOIA but
Professor Phil Jones, head of the unit, was cleared of dishonestly fiddling the data to strengthen his evidence.
>
>Of course examining the actual report and the selectively cited evidence reveals the Inquiry has ignored the obvious and glaring data manipulation of not just Jones but the CRU as a whole. The Inquiry further uses Jones' own explanation of "trick" and "hide the decline" as a "clever thing to do" rather than the substitution of inconvenient data that it was.
>
>Here's the report:
>
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/hc-387-i-uea-final-embargoed-v2.pdf
>
>McCintyre has posted a bit on the ignored issues:
>
http://climateaudit.org/2010/03/31/tricking-the-committee/
>
>and Graham Stringer dissent:
>
http://climateaudit.org/2010/03/30/stringers-dissents-a-split-decision/
>
>Given the glaringly obviously bias of the members of the forthcoming Royal Society Panel's inquiry I will expect more of the same.
Regards N Mc Donald
Previous
Reply
Map
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only