>I read occasional HuffPo articles, but can't remember the last time I landed on their home page. But what's your evidence for saying that? What outside organization has classified HuffPo as whatever you think is the left-wing equivalent of white nationalist? What statements have HuffPo leaders made that indicate that they're aiming to provide a home for the extreme left wing (like the Bannon quote I posted)?
>
>I do not have the time to go googling that to come up with examples that support my libertarian POV. Obviously, I am not going to post examples that support your liberal POV ;). Everything I have read on the Huffington Post web sight makes me believe that they ARE aiming to provide a home for the extreme left wing. Just my opinion and I am entitled to it...

I don't disagree with you that HuffPo is liberal. That wasn't my point. My point is that Breitbart is extreme and the guy running it has said that they are specifically providing a platform for white nationalists (aka the alt-right).

I'm not sure what you consider to be extremists on the left, as opposed to mainstream liberal.

>
>This article says that Trump's been party to about 3,500 lawsuits, plaintiff in about 1,900: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/01/donald-trump-lawsuits-legal-battles/84995854/
>
>What evidence do you have of the Clintons being party to anything like that number of suits?
>
>I was not referring to the number of lawsuits filed by anyone. I was referring to your inference that the Clintons are squeaky clean highly ethical people who are who do not want to file a lawsuit for libel because this would open them up to even more libel and slander. If that is what you truly believe, I really do want some of whatever you are drinking ;)

You're putting words in my mouth. I simply said that they presumably don't see the value in suing everyone who says nasty things about them.

Tamar