>I'd be relieved because I truly believe that Trump is a danger to democracy and the American experiment. However, I'd also question whether we really want a system that isn't one person-one vote.
>
>Tell me - is there any republican presidential nominee that you did NOT think was a danger to democracy? I bet the answer is going to be NO.
>
>Hopefully, now that all this nonsense is settled and Trump is, according to the current constitutional rules, our president-elect, all this liberal boo-hooing will finally subside. Unfortunately, I doubt it. I suspect that instead of doing an honest post-mortem on why they failed and lost dems at every level of government - municipal, state, federal, they will just continue with this stupid blame game. It really is very sad. Time for the dems to face reality.

You seem to be forgetting the Democrat rule book:
* When we win, we will do what we want and you will shut up.
* When you win, you must compromise with us.

Most of the press agrees with this, so it must be true.
Right?