Fabio, yes I remeber now, I have read a longtime ago something about that.
>Gojko, now remember this issue ( a bug ). I post it some months ago.
>The first time, besides producing the error, VFP removes the definition of the cdx,
>in this way the second time cannot verify him the error.

In fact, missed CDX I can check like any other file with FILE(). I did that and if that is right I return file back from EXE with STRTOFILE ( FILETOSTR(...),...).(I include previously in projet copy of CDXs). It seems it works ( idea is not mine, read somewhere somebody did something like that ... ). Now, for errors like 114, corrupted CDX, how can I
recognize them in advance and do the same but with esacping messages Cancel - Ignore, which
confuses users ? ( I am considering to purchase SDT , but not at his moment ).
Many thanks, Gojko