>>So what? Do you expect a team of cineast waiting around for a block of ice to fall down? It's the message that needed to pass, not actual pictures.
>>
>>Tell me, do you really think that we can continue to reject all kinds of chemicals in the air and that it will have no consequences whatsoever in near or far future?
>
>The simple answer is yes. The Earth will adjust accordingly as it always has. This planet has absorbed massive geological events throughout its history, we are the ants on this global farm.
>
>Now, that's not to say I'm against clean air, water, etc. I have lived all my life, minus a few years in college, on a farm, so I know quite a bit about maintaining good agricultural practices and maintaining balance in our environment. What the environmental movement has been doing for 40 years is not for the good of our future, it is about money, land and power.
>
>The hoax of anthropogenic global warming is a power grab by highly entrenched interests for various nefarious purposes, including, but not limited to : constricting capitalism, restricting America's influence and abolishing property rights.
>
>>>"It goes without saying that climate realists around the world believe Nobel Laureate Al Gore used false information throughout his schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" in order to generate global warming hysteria.
>>>
>>>On Friday, it was revealed by ABC News that one of the famous shots of supposed Antarctic ice shelves in the film was actually a computer-generated image from the 2004 science fiction blockbuster The Day After Tomorrow."
>>>
>>>
http://newsbusters.org/node/20680?q=blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/04/22/abc-s-20-20-gore-used-fictional-film-clip-inconvenient-truththere was a show on discovery recently about the earth post human. It said something like in 1000 years, all traces of human occupation would be buried, eaten, or non-visible. When mother nature tires of us or we pollute to the point that all is garbage and unusable, we will be swatted like bugs and the earth will renew.
