>>>>>>>Is available for download
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=842ACEC8-F79C-41CD-AB1A-AE4F184387C2&displaylang=en
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Copy your old one first - you may need it ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Take any class
>>>>>>>eg. XmlAdapter, Object Properties, Methods, and Events
>>>>>>>All the links on the properties and methods have disappeared
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Same for Textbox, EditBox, Collection, Grid, ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So are you saying that the new help file is even worse than the existing one?
>>>>>__
>>>>>I am, Mike, sorry
>>>>>
>>>>>Download it into a tmp folder
>>>>>start it by double-clicking
>>>>>type textbox in the index
>>>>>enter
>>>>>Take Textbox Control Object Properties, Methods, and Events
>>>>>Look at the right side where all properties and methods appear. Not a single one is underligned
>>>>>
>>>>>It took me 5 min to find it. They have not even tested their help file
>>>>>
>>>>>SP2 introduced bugs - I'm sorry that I have used sp2 for the field - Hard, very hard to undo that
>>>>>
>>>>>Anyone asking for SP3 ? Not me
>>>>
>>>>It makes you wonder whether it was wise for the VFP MVPs to lobby Microsoft for yet another patch release. They may not have enough resources left to do it properly.
>>>
>>>While it looks like they sure are short of VFP resources, I would hope that Microsoft pride' itself would be enough to cause a product's FINAL Help file to be complete and acurate and fully functional!
>>
>>It's hard to always be acurate (ducking).
>>
>>But seriously, my point wasn't that a patch shouldn't be accurate. It was that Microsoft should have recognized the high probability that it wouldn't be given the meager resources available.
>
>I understood. I feel that pride alone aought to have been sufficient motivation for MS to ENSURE that the final Hep was functionl and complete.
>It's not like they had to amend any of the content.
>
>Much better pic, by the way.

It couldn't have been much worse, could it? ;-)

Not sure where the halo effect came from, though....