>> 0.98 * 7.61 ------> 1 * 8 (not sure about the 0.98 going to 1 on this one)
>The fourth example, once again, is correct: rounding to 1 s.d. means, in this case, rounding to the closest 0.1; 0.98 is closer to 1.0 than to 0.9. Or just look at the algorithm in the previos paragraph (the 8 is dropped, 0.9 is increased to 1.0).
There is a "fudge" factor inherent in rounding: how big is the difference percentage-wise to the rounded operand.
In case of the fourth example I'd be perfectly happy to spare myself the effort to round up to 8 and leave it at 7.61, which is much closer to the actual result. Even true for 1.02 * 7.61, were at least the sides of the cut off parts are eaqulizing and not both skewing in the same direction.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement