>You don't think China, with their antics before and during the Olympics weren't treating the whole thing politically? The Olympics has always been a political football. Countries have boycotted various olympics at different times. There are few countries that are as blatant in their human rights violations as China. Should we next award the Olympics to North Korea, or maybe to Zimbabwe? Somewhere a line has to be drawn over which we should not step. Should we be content to award the olympics to a country that steals it's citizens homes to build an arena? > >I agree that almost every country in the world is probably guilty of some violation, but finding countries that are as bad as China is a difficult task. I see hosting the Olympics as an honour, and I don't believe that honour should be sullied by giving it to a country that has done nothing to earn it.
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100 "When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.) "Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown "De omnibus dubitandum"
