>Sure, but what relation does it have to her ability to be VP? It was something that they trotted out to show what a family type person she is and it was aimed for sympathy and not much else.
>
>As far as her daughter's pregnancy, it could also be argued that it is about her (as a mother), unable to instill her values in her child, let alone the country.
>
>Personally I don't go that way, but those arguments can be made either way, and if her abilities as a mother are not a fair subject for debate in one case, then they should not be in either case. Fair is fair.

My issue is what her accepting this nomination at this moment in her family's life says about her judgment. How could she expose her daughter to international scrutiny this way? Same question about her choice to return home from Texas when she was leaking amniotic fluid, without seeing a doctor first? I question her judgment.

Tamar