>We have a registration program written in VFP5 (ported to 6) which processing online and IVR registrations to be posted into our order entry/call tracking system. Everything seems to work fine with the record information with the exception of one or two of the compound indexes. There is always one record which is misplaced in the index after the registrations have been INSERTed into the 2x table from VFP6. We have another lead generating program which updates a 2x table from VFP6 with no problems. Both table have CDXes with compound indexes.
>
>Has anyone else experienced these results? Is there something I can do to correct this problem (other than re-writing the program in FP2x)?
>
>TIA!
>
>-dave

Hi Dave,
This won't solve your problem, but we've been updating FPW 2.6 tables with VFP3, 5 and 6 for two years now (about 60 different tables) and never had an index problem.