>>>The flaw in your theory is that sheer quantity alone denotes "market leader"
>
>The flaw I see is that nobody around here except two Microsoft MVPs seems to agree that Android is a cheap plastic imitation that won't be dominant for much longer. You may insist that MVP status gives credibility but that's up to the audience, not you.

I would provide you the links to blog posts from non-MVP's, non-MS people who have said the same thing. It is a cheap imitaion of the IPhone, there is no way you can get around that fact. It looks like the IPhone and works like the IPhone. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, guess what? Its not my MVP that says this, its my having used the phone for over 1.5 years, it outperforms both the IPhone and Android easily. When people give it a fair comparison, there will be no contest. You can read the facts but like others here, "the facts, the facts, we don't need no stinking facts". So frame you reply however you want as an Anti-MS, Google apologist, but know that the only thing separating you from MIke Beane right now is about 3 beers and a picture...