>>>>I was nearly murdered by school yard scum like Walter. So, who knows more about bullying, me or you?
>>>
>>>First, I got death threats here on the UT in late July 2005 from William Sanders (who later admitted he was drunk)
>>>
>>>Mike, I've read nearly all the exchanges between the two of you. Definitely some name calling (which, IMO, you escalated), definitely hostility - but considering you are equating that with "almost murdered", you couldn't possibly be less credible in your endeavors to be talking about "science".
>>>
>>>You have lost all perspective. At least Mike Beane (god rest his soul) could attribute his rantings and behavior to alcoholism. What's your excuse?
>>
>>If you believe washout walters OPINION equals my SCIENCE it is you that are missing all perspective.
>
>Again mike, you have no idea what science is or means. I've never made a claim my opinions are science, YOU ARE MAKING THAT CLAIM. You've failed to demonstrate to know what science really means.
>
>It surely does not mean:
>1. If a language supports a feature, you should use that feature.
>2. That a feature can be used to solve a particular problem, it is the only way to solve the problem or even the best way to solve the problem
>
>You have been arguing both.

Ach Walter hou er mee op.