Laughable Claude,

When somebody comes after you with technical responses you run for the hills and ignore the message or make some 'Yeah well...' comment that doesn't offer anything constructive. I've never seen a constructive technical response from you for any technical response I've given. The most technical I've seen for you is ask a follow up question, the answer of which you will gladly ignore next time it fits your purposes. Why should anybody waste their time giving you a technical answer? When's the last time YOU have given a technical answer instead of a plain party line?

I don't give a damn what you do to praise your product or the VFP MTDLL architecture as long as it's accurate. Same if you talk about other products especially mine. If it's not accurate I have a responsibility to point that out. As does anybody else for any claims made by me or anybody else.


This is a public community and the information that goes out here affects people. It's generally ruled by common sense and social responsibility neither of which seem to be qualities that you are familiar with.

+++ Rick ---

>Rick had a hissy fit like you. Let's discuss the technical merits, people, not get into accusations. To review, here are the technical items I stated were the reasons to use AVFP:
>1.) multi-threaded. Please tell me what's wrong with this argument?
>2.) Free. This isn't valid?? Or do you think this is unfair??
>3.) Uses ASP.NET. I realize there are some people that just want to dump VFP for ASP.NET, but, I dont't see why they can't be used together. Is this not a valid thing to attempt to do?
>So, what is your problem?? If you start to get "real" maybe I'll lift the bozo filter..
>>You won't get this because of the filter, but for lurkers... You think the whole thing boiled down to multi-threading? Very narrow view of this thread. You might want to reread all the posts and review that opinion. Especially your initial response and Rick's comments. Filter on.
>>
>>>BOZO filter ON, but, I am not blatantly marketing anything. You may misconstrue it that way, but you are wrong. I'm bringing up technical issues and expecting technical rebuttals, not hissy fits. If you think mtdlls are slower or less efficient (I stated they were faster and more efficient), then, where are your arguments other than to say I'm just "marketing my product"? If you can't understand that multi-threading is better than non multi-threading, then you may want to consider another profession...
>>
>>>>Never said you were getting money. I essentially said that you did not show all sides by blatently marketing the product. Yours may be the best, even the greatest thing since water, but your response wasn't fair to the question. Please, use your bozo filter if you like. I use it often.