Perry,

Your rude, insulting, and arrogant comments do nothing to advance your argument. They say much more about you than me. Offering and taking .NET training is fine, it's the way they have been acting like vultures circling a not dead, but vibrant language that has irritated people. You say people are moving to more modern languages, then immediately give VFP to VB conversion projects over the last 7 years as an example. Well, explain to me how VB, which has only become object oriented in the last 2 years, is more modern than VFP, which has been OO for the past 8 or 9 years? And, as I said, Kevin's verbal trashing of VFP at VFP conventions during a presentation has not been received well.

Now, can I expect more pointless insults or can you state your argument without them?


>What a moron!!!!!!
>
>Personally I'm offended by folks with under 50 IQs posting on this forum.
>
>Possibly in Fayetteville, there's not a resonable size IT community for you to see. So let me describe what's occuring in the rest of the world for you. Foxpro usage has been on a download spiral for many years. This spiral has not been caused by Kevin, Marcus, etc. It's been caused by companies moving on to more modern languages, end of story.
>
>For at least the last 7 years a very large percentage of posted VFP jobs, are for conversion projects. First from VFP to VB. Now from VFP to .Net.
>
>This being the case what problem do you have with people getting training so they can fill those job requirements?????
>