Hi Claude,

Capitalism: you have a market and create a product for it
Communism: you have a product and create a market for it
Conclusion: .net = communism (duck!)

>Then I would say a lot of this conversion talk is wishful thinking, especially if you're not footing the bill..
>>I will keep my eyes open. But I do think it's a little early.
>>
>>>As I asked Martin, can you give some examples of successful complete rewrites of VFP apps to .NET or is it too early?
>>>>As Martin mentioned, it is just not that easy to make use of legacy code in a new app. I've worked on several apps that were developed several years and have many hands in it since.
>>>>
>>>>Typically in this case, the rewrite is used as an excuse to take a patchwork app and rewrite it from the ground up. So interop is not an option since the objective is to remove the spaghetti code.
>>>>
>>>>PF
>>>>
>>>>>That is probably one of the more insightful takes on this whole issue I have heard.
>>>>>
>>>>>>It appears most .Net apps are either new apps, or rewrites. From my experience, when companies switch from Foxpro to .Net, they are not interested in interop.