Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
This is so much fun...
Message
 
To
14/04/2005 11:51:18
John Baird
Coatesville, Pennsylvania, United States
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Conferences & events
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01004448
Message ID:
01005100
Views:
24
John,

Just curious with .net 2.0 and VS 2005 et all what are you using for the rewrite.

I'm going straight J2EE 5.0 Eclipse, Hibernate, mySQL / Oracle / SQL-server knowing full well if I keep the code very generic. I can use the MS Convert wizard to convert me to C# if J2EE dies ;)

jp



>Nope. We are in the middle of an extensive rewrite in .net of 5 of our premier applications. Were talking millions of lines of code, I'll let you know how the rewrite went in about 1 year from now..
>
>
>
>>Then I would say a lot of this conversion talk is wishful thinking, especially if you're not footing the bill..
>>>I will keep my eyes open. But I do think it's a little early.
>>>
>>>>As I asked Martin, can you give some examples of successful complete rewrites of VFP apps to .NET or is it too early?
>>>>>As Martin mentioned, it is just not that easy to make use of legacy code in a new app. I've worked on several apps that were developed several years and have many hands in it since.
>>>>>
>>>>>Typically in this case, the rewrite is used as an excuse to take a patchwork app and rewrite it f
>
>rom the ground up. So interop is not an option since the objective is to remove the spaghetti code.
>>>>>
>>>>>PF
>>>>>
>>>>>>That is probably one of the more insightful takes on this whole issue I have heard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It appears most .Net apps are either new apps, or rewrites. From my experience, when companies switch from Foxpro to .Net, they are not interested in interop.
User: "Can you make this small cosmetic change"

Programmer: "Just another total rewrite"
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform