>>I'd also like to know why it might be that re-writing something in .NET would make for "better code". I see .NET as still in a relative infancy, so both the number of (truly) skilled developers is likely limited and things can change dramatically in the framework by the time .NET matures.
>
>I didn't say that. My comments were language-agnostic. I said that tons of code in the real world is awful and would be better thrown out than updated.

Fair enough - my error.


>
>Tamar