>I'm sorry but I'm not sure who you're arguing with because I never said anything even close to what you are arguing against.

Sorry that my english not as the same lavel as yours...

- I said it is a bug
- you said my arguments are irrelevant because not knowing inner form working
- I said you don't to have to know VFP inner side to see / estimate if a bug (logical/functional) or not
- you said the above > I'm, sorry but...
- I'm strogly wondering why you are not seeing why I'm arguing....
- I still say that you don't have to know VFP inner sides to estimate a bug

-------------

But after I said that "it's a bug" you said my "arguments are totaly irrelevant because... I have any idea how HalHeightCaption property setting affects inner form working"

What I was saying was that when VFP doesn't respect its setting and not working logically or functionally (not against the DOC but against the common sense and logic) it should be consider as a bug no matter what's the inner work (that no one us knows expect MS team but they are still asking us to send bugs we have found - with your logic we rather found DOC things than bugs because we don't know anything about VFP inner side work)

No bad feeling, if Simon White accepts (do you?) to send this to MS and they give as a bucket then we would see if a doc or bug thing.

Hope you find some logic in my even bad english statement.

AT