>>I think it's a pretty safe bet that there HAS to be a SP for VFP9.
>>
>
>Jim,
>
>would you care to elaborate on this? Are there any specific issues you have in mind?

I've seen a few reported that seem troublesome to me.
Two that come to mind are:

1) Increased number of 2065 errors, specifically on .TMP files apparently having view data in them;
2) SQL Select that seems not to 'find' a table that is already opened.

cheers

>
>Eyvind.