Whatever ...

>I am not bad mouthing EPS. I had only hoped to noteing the obvious: Why us a VFP to NOT conversion service from a business whose product is publications when there are full-time NOT experts that do not avert their attention with products like books, magazines and seminars; working the trenches build big ened to end NOT apps.
>
>I thought I had stated the obvious - and from what I read I did not "beat up" on anybody, I just stated the obvious expertise and product line. Do you see something I disparged EPS with. In fact - EPS is nowhere in the post - need to talk, Bonnie?:-)
>
>From a business point of view, the best value for NOT projects would be Eurasian NOT shops.
>
>Jeez, Luueezze, why are you overly nuturing EPS?:-)
>
>You give it a rest!
>
>>Jeez Louise, Terry ... what is your problem with EPS? You are *always* bad-mouthing them!! What happened ... did you apply for a job there and they didn't want to hire you? Can't imagine why else you "have it in for them" so badly.
>>
>>Give it a rest ...
>>
>>~~Bonnie
>>
>>
>>
>>>But - and I think you would have to agree - there are shops and engineers (or maybe just "one" developer would be all that is needed) in the DOT NOT space that certainly have more experience than the group hired by Quay.
>>>
>>>The team hired by Quay are halfway between VFP and DOT NOT. Most of thier expertise is in "How To" publications and consultant fees generated from back end hand holding gigs.
>>>
>>>I don't know for a fact - but my guess is that the talent pool is a lot deeper than the VFP used-to-be's (or NOT wanna-be's) than the services team Quay limited themselves to.
>>>
>>>Why fish around the VFP community for NOT developers and NOT projects. It just seems weak. We'll have to see how the project fares - I guess<g>