>From earlier:
>
>>Was the taste of the bird relevant?
>
>You said:
>Yes.
>
>You have said the bird tasted like chicken.
>

Sorry about that one. That was a joki.

>Now:
>>>Is the fact that it did taste like chicken relevant?
>>

No.

>>The answer to the first question above, and this is important, is no.
>
>Did the bird taste like chicken *and* something else?
>
>Am I confused? :)


The two important questions are: to erase confusion.

1. Is the taste of the bird important? Yes.

2. Has this person have ever tasted pigeion? No.

Now you have to start asking about what happened on that deserted island.