>Hi Nadya,
>
>There wasn't a chicken...(well, it didn't taste like chicken). You've got to keep up. :)
>
>>May be it was not a pigeon, but a chicken? Now, if I'm right, why this is important? Perhaps it was not an ordinary chicken...
>>
>>
Are you sure it was a pigeon?

Can you re-tell the story again?

I missed the whole thread. I'm lucky I saw Steve's message.

He-he :) I'm replying to you and not Dan, as I thought :)