Thank you for your help

Neil
>Sorry.
>
>I'm so used to ASP errors being hard to track down because a function may not actually error. What ever script, you're running, will just stop dead in its tracks. Typically, you have to put alerts before and after a block of suspect code and narrow that block of code until you can find the exact line.
>
>But as you've clearly stated:
>>>>This is the line that causes the error.
>>>>set oUserData = oRemoteUser.GetDatax(4)
>
>So I've just missed the boat on this one.
>
>>What do you mean by: You've got alerts surrounding in asp?
>>Neil
>>
>>
>>>Let me know if the link to the list sent by Jim helps.
>>>
>>>You've got alerts surrounding in the ASP to find which line is actually blowing?
>>>
>>>>I don't think the actual error will help but the command that the generates the error may be helpful.
>>>>The error is: Object required: 'oRemoteUser.getdatax(...)
>>>>
>>>>This is the line that causes the error.
>>>>set oUserData = oRemoteUser.GetDatax(4)
>>>>
>>>>I am pretty sure that oRemoteUser.GetDatax(4)
>>>>crashes and that is why oUserData does not end up as as object. The MTDLL, when compiled in vfp9, works fine from the vfp command window but not when instansiated form ASP.
>>>>
>>>>Neil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>What is the error?
>>>>>
>>>>>>How about the "set" commands. I want to set up the initial environment so that everything works as it did in vfp6,7,8. For example: SQL commands, select(), etc. And.... I have a MTDLL that when compiled in vfp8 works fine when it is instantiated from an active server page. But when I compile it in vfp9 and instaniate it on an ASP the page throws errors. I have to assume the environment is the only difference and that is why I am looking for environment settings in vfp9 that need to be set.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Neil
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>HI,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Can someome please point me in the direction of any list that has been compiled regarding upgrading an older vfp project to vfp9 ie: compatability issues??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>>>>Neil
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I don't have a list. But I've found no significant problems from 6 and up to 9.