>Hi, Jim.
>
>>Based on your subsequent reply to PerryF, your first sentence below was very misleading. Are you practising to be a lawyer?
>>
>>Your reply to PerryF, coupled with the statement below, says to me that the VFP Team is being absorbed into the VS team. A sad situation, to be sure.
>
>Sorry to tell you, but the VFP team IS part of the Visual Studio Data group since a year or more (I really lost track of the time).

Boy, you really have a low regard for my memory.
And I'd say you have a bit of twisted "logic" here too! It doesn't matter where the VFP Team is situated organizationally, as long as they are working on VFP.
We have a statement by KenL that the "VFP Team" (what's left of it) is busy adding VFP-like features to .NET. But his original statement wasn't anything like that, leaving the impression (deliberately, no doubt) that the VFP Team is working to make VFP and .NET work better TOGETHER.

Have you checked the Wiki's VFP Team listing recently? There's almost no one left!!!

You can take cheap shots like this any time. Maybe they will even endear you to the .NET crowd. They aren't disturbed by logic.

Jim


>
>Regards,