SNIP>
>What I really can't understand is why you refer to the .NET crowd as if they were a band of bad people working on a complot, or some fools lacking any logic. Do you really think that .NET is a defective, incomplete or poor technology?

It gets very very tiresome hearing the .NET crowd HERE say that we (VFP adherents) are too afraid/lazy to learn a new language, that we are old and burned out, that .NET **IS** great already (the whole thing, which is far far more than "a language" is about 3 years old (i.e YOUNG)), that we are dumb not to see the writing on the wall, etc. etc. etc. They (the .NET crowd here) can't seem to just sit back and watch all of us go off into the obvious oblivion, but rather have to keep repeating and repeating and repeating how dumb/stupid we are for not jumping onto the latest bandwagon.

>
>Please, don't let your good sentiments towards a nice tool affect your judgement about others.

I *did* take your simple statement as bordering on insult. Please accept my apology for mis-interpreting. But a "VFP Team" that is working on .NET is a "VFP Team" in name only. A VFP Team within a .NET organization, but working full time on VFP, is still a VFP Team. KenL's statement suggests we are damn near the former. That he tried to INFERdifferently in his first statement is bothersome in the extreme.
>
>Best regards,