3rd request: I thought you were going to give us a list of completed VFP/.NET conversion projects with details. Did I misunderstand?

>Most that I've seen or heard about are doing a total re-write, often by creating two development teams (one for the new version and a legacy team for the current version).
>
>As I said in my last post, interop is not viewed as a magic bullet by some .NET authors who have described the performance costs of interop with the COM subsystem, as well as the possible additional efforts in managing a mixed environment. I'm not saying interop isn't an option, it is: but it does carry some considerations.
>
>Kevin