>SNIP
>>
>>I think we have these cities in NY. In general, you're right, it's a waste of time. However, if I see the obvious problems and it doesn't take more than 15 sec. of my time to fix them, I'll go ahead and fix.
>
>So if you saw Muenchen or Mьnchen you would "fix" it?... Which?...to what?
>

Yes, it is problematic. Here we have Duesseldorf and Dusseldorf, for example. Both seems to be acceptable. May be we need to choose one which is used most...

>If you saw St. John, St. John's and Saint Johns you would fix it?... which?... to what?
>

I'm wondering if there is official postoffice spelling, which we can use.

>Sorry, but I wouldn't trust you to touch ANY of this. Maybe your son...

Presently we have several groups. I think, it's better to use one spelling for all similar entries... E.g. in this case we would have better statistical representation, though Sergey tells it's oxymoron anyway... < g >