The same principle was attempted in previous centuries with disastrous results. At one time, there were no free clinics for those without medical insurance and you could only receive medical care at hospitals if you could pay out of your pocket. Church organizations (consisting mainly of married financially secure women volunteers or older single daughters of a wealthy family with no other prospects) provided some medical care to street prostitutes but those receiving the care had to sit through religious sermons, lectures, and often denounce their only means of support. I cannot believe it is happening again. I completely agree with education on prevention (shouldn't the audience for that group be mostly those not infected?) as well as treatment, but a signed statement? Sheesh, give me a break.


>... How recognition of that model evolved into requiring beneficiafies of assistance to sign a declaration against prostitution one will never know...
>
>I can't believe you don't see the connection....