>Ok Dragan.
>I'm the KrAzY one. Lets just drop it.

Oh, no, you don't give up like that. Actually, you really got me curious. Where did you get the idea that the only way would be to provide sufficient number of people who would... what, "provide the services"? Don't you really have any other model in your mind?

>After May, it's all over for me anyways.

Don't know what you mean here, but let's enjoy this exchange for this month then.

>In my "fantacy" world there are those that are more deserving of what little resources we have before we can think about those that live life recklessly. And just because something seems like a loss cause doesn't mean we give up.

I haven't given up on medical technicians, either. I think they do deserve help when they catch HIV, despite their engaging in a risky activity (remember, all these sharp things in the presence of sick people), and despite of them doing it completely voluntarily and for money. The voluntarity clause doesn't apply to 99% of the prostitutes around the world, so I really don't understand why are the victims undeserving of help in their case. Maybe because of the 1% of them who are doing it for fun and money?

>And as far as Brazilians (or anyone else) turning down the money, fine. But why couldn't they have accepted it and help some of their people.

Have you ever heard of the words like "dignity", "pride" and "sovereignity"? Or the phrase "nobody will tell us what to do"?

> And later if France or some other more "generous" and more "enlighten" nation contribute, they can do whatever they wish.

Funny that you'd expect France to cover what USA can't... but that's life.