>>Brad,
>>
>>Temporary do in the command window:
>>
>>_builder = home()+"\builder.app"
>>
>>then try any form which has Builder and BuilderX properties set.
>>
>
>
>I understand what you're saying... As you know I don't have a Builder or BuilderX property in any of my classes. But I assume that if someone does (i.e. Mere Mortals), then that Builder program referenced by the property has to be responsible for handling the possibility of the string "MEMBERDATA" being passed as the 2nd parameter.
>
>Or maybe I'm wrong... maybe BUILDER.PRG is not handling the presence of a Builder property correctly... or it's calling the specifically-reference Builder program (of the Builder property) when it really shouldn't be. There does seem to be code in BUILDER.PRG to do that, but for some reason, maybe it's not working.
>
>I don't know what the right answer is.
>
>--Brad

May be somebody using MereMortals can jump in. In the meantime I've just sent a bug report.