>I have a VFP 9 compiled version of ActiveVFP as well as one for VFP8, VFP7SP1, and VFP6SP5. I think it's noticably faster in VFP9 as well as more enjoyable because of the better designed IDE. Also it looks like ExecScript works much better for developers that want to execute vfp code in HTML. I was hoping that VFP Reports could run directly from mtdlls in 9 but that was probably to hard to implement in an MT environment. What features of 9 are you referring to?

I wasn't referring to any specific features. I was wondering if you were taking advantage of new features in VFP 9.0. I don't know of any reason why reports coudn't run in an MT DLL environment.