General information
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Well, as I said I made some costmetic changes of the code during posting. Sorry, shouldn't have done this. To be more precise I exchanged the hard coded values 2005 and 1 with the vars. If you fix the code it does updates.
And all in all it's slower than the sql, although I was lucky (or unlucky), that the xbase code ran faster in the two test calls I only did.
The time needed by either sql or xBase varies very much. Taking 2 to 14 seconds with sql and 3 to 50 seconds with xBase on a 1Ghz PIII notebook with 128 MB ram and 40GB HDD. In My first testruns I got some of the best xCase running times and about 2-3 times slower SQL running times.
Now, as I did some more test runs I'd also concratulate to SQL. Maybe the xCase variant can be optimized a little further if I analyize it with COVERAGE. Just for the fun of it...
Bye, Olaf.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only