CREATE CURSOR curTest (cField c(1)) cField = 1As I've seen you also were gaining performance with STORE vs. = in another posting here...
tt = SECONDS() FOR lnCount = 1 TO 1000000 store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar store m.lnMemvar To lnMemvar ENDFOR ? SECONDS()-m.ttThe reason may be that vfp now doesn't have to decide what is meant by "=", an assignment or comparison operation. I wonder why this isn't decided at compile time. I don't see me coding STORE from now on just because it's faster.