>>(snip)
>>>
>>>Jim, yes or no, do you believe the individual should hold themselves responsible
>>>(and be held responsible) for his/her actions and reactions?
>>>
>>
>>Oh yes, Kevin, so why don't you give us an honest explanation of your motivation in starting this thread.
>
>There's "honest" and then there's "honest", Mike.
>
>You'll get the one that passes muster with the UT rulebook and not a hint of trolling in his reply.
>
>cheers

Heavens, Jim, I don't expect even a hint of nastiness in his reply. I'm just curious what on earth Goff might have to say in reply to my direct question. Whatever he says (or doesn't say) can hardly fail to be very revealing of his true character. I'll leave it to others to draw their own conclusions.