>>Hi Jess,
>>
>>>We lost 2 projects because of the problem alone. For us as developers, it does not matter to us, but a lot client are saying that there data are not secured with VFP DBC/Tables that's why they are asking for it.
>>
>>SQL Server works great with VFP. If the cost becomes a factor then you could use access database and implement the security.
>
>Kamal, we want the native VFP database because of the Rushmore Technology. Cost is secondary to us. What we are longing for is just Basic Security features, and therefore, we are not expecting it to be a high performance database.