Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Slow save in VFP9 comparing with VFP8
Message
From
30/05/2005 18:01:51
 
 
To
26/05/2005 22:24:26
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9
OS:
Windows XP SP2
Database:
Visual FoxPro
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01015381
Message ID:
01018600
Views:
18
Jim,

With all due respect, what looks so “UNBELIEVABLE” to you?

Think of this scenario: you add a two words line of code to your program, the second word is ignored by the compiler (maybe because it's implicit, I don't know but it doesn't matter), so you assume the whole line was fine.
Later on, you upgrade to the next version of the language, which now does not ignore that second word, causing, if not used properly, an unacceptable slow performance.

Isn’t this the perfect scenario to make mistakes? Of course, once the car got stuck in the mud, is very easy to realize which path the driver shouldn’t have taken.

No one to blame here I guess, I know what VFP is not strong typed and that I have to deal with that, and I know also that the clause FORCE is not mentioned with FLUSH in VFP8 Help.

But I could be wrong; maybe what I described here is not a possible scenario for a perfect programmer that can write perfect code.

In any case, I don’t think your hurtful words towards Nadya add any good to the process of learning that you can’t go happily using FLUSH FORCE for all work areas opened without expecting poor performance, as Jim Weil explained it very well. I’d rather be thankful to Jim Weil and Nadya for letting me know their experience.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform