Sergey,
I think the concept of .NET at a lower level (not at the language semantics) is probably more Java based, and C# certainly would look that way but only in as much as Java heritage is from C++. Think about it, the whole concept of managed runtimes (sandboxing etc.) has been around for decades and if I where MS I would be stupid to ignore whats gone before me, especially Java. However from a language standpoint I would be equally stupid to ignore the fact that the company and its products are predominantly C/C++, why would you choose language semantics that don't help your thousands of C/C++ developers adopt the managed world?
Regards
Neil
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only