<snip>

>>The reason is that I go to monthly meetings and when they show stuff with .Net some of the things in the editor are really cool.
>
>Yeah, and the time and effort (costs) of adding IDE things to VFP is not as important has how VFP apps deploy (the end user experience). The runtime (end result) is what is more important than nice features. Keep in mind that the VFP team now (and with VFP 9.0) is under 10 people while people working on VS 2005 and the .NET Framework is well over 1000.

I understand. I guess that it is better for the long term viability of the Fox.