>>>>Hmmm I'm surprised to receive a reply from you. I thought I knew all the .Net Bullies <g>
>>>
>>>Actually, we have spoken on this subject before. It had just been awhile because *I* moved on. <bg>
>>
>>What an interesting argument. "I moved on". When I see that as the main argument this tells me that you're one of those building apps not based on the needs of the customer but based on your needs. It sure looks better to state in your resume that you've been building apps with .Net rather than with VFP.
>>
>>Not necessarily better for your customer but for you it must do wonders.
>>
>>You don't necessarily need to reply because apparently you moved on. <vbg>
>
>Actually, I meant that I "had moved on" from our discussion. I probably should have been more clear with you, sorry. I was implying, and now saying, that you haven't moved on from that discussion, as is evidenced by calling out the ".Net bullies" here. As I, and many of the other ".Net bullies" have said many times here, to no avail, I do still use VFP (9.0) and yet, somehow, I manage to be able to use .Net as well. It's a gift I guess.

Excuse me Kelly. I misunderstood what you said. Perhaps you did'nt said enough or it's because english is'nt my native language or perhaps... whatever. What is said is said.

You were implying? So you relied on my "Psychic gifts" as you mentioned in another reply <g>

Anyways you implied and I implied. Again I'm sorry.