>>>VFP/.NET Interop type improvements needed, in my humble opinion:
>>>1.) VFP COM interop with ASP.NET (as has been done with ActiveVFP - either use that or improve upon it)
>>>2.) VFP COM debugging - as has been done by Maurice de Bejir
>>>3.) VFP reporting from web mtdlls - right now a vfp COM .exe has to be called from the vfp mtdll to workaround this problem
>>>4.) good docs on vfp com interop with .NET
>>
>>Can you do me a favor and re-post your suggestions here in the new Sedna section just added? I'd like good suggestions like this to be all compiled into that new section for people to read and comment on over time. Thanks. :)
>
>Ken, I have not understood this:
>VFPT's members participate to the Sedna section arguments or observe only ?

I'd say that you do whatever you feel like. You participate and/or you read.