Hi, Fabio.

>From how much it writes Ken, and from the last Calvin Hsia's blog,
>can be only concluded that Sedna is the last job of the VFPT.

Can't figure what did you read in Calvin's blog that drives you to such conclusion. As for the Roadmap, I can't derive that either.

>What I do not comprise is like much UT members asks improvements
>for the VFP's engine.
>
>I will be very happy for being refuted from the facts,
>but the Team does not have some intention to throw resources in order to improve the VFP Engine behaviours.
>
>Sedna, the VFP's sepulchre,
>it serves to bury VFP and to carry the VFP's Spirits in .NET.

As I see it, if they really want to push anyone to .NET, they would have provided migration tools. Look at VB6.

>Honestly, without to write a new language,
>I have many doubts that, within C#,
>can be constructed something that is similar to the VFP spirit:
>- dataSessions and local transactions
>- inlines sql commands
>- low level xbases
>- dynamic class definition with very simple coding

Well, there will be always something we will miss or have preferred different, but they are working (at research level) in several of this aspects. Time will tell...

Best regards,