John,

Well, no, it's not a major issue. I didn't say it's bad having one file with very little in it. But, why would you want to organize these classes this way? Logically, to me anyway (and I'm not alone), this doesn't make much sense. And I notice in your reply to Kevin that you've grouped them all together yourself, you devil. <g>

I guess we can agree to disagree on this ... you say it should be a simple rule that one should always adhere to, I don't think it should be a hard and fast rule. I don't think that there's any reason why one can't "mix and match".

~~Bonnie


>>>I can't justify having one file that contains only that.
>
>Not a major contentious issue IMHO, but at the risk of seeming obtuse: why is it so bad to have a file with little in it- IOW why does it require a justification? Not that I want to seem to agree with those EPS ogres ;-) but I see it as a simple rule that offers benefit if applied without fail from day 1, especially for VFP people who may be accustomed to giant SET CLASSLIBs...