>I don't suppose you've got anything that good for string theory, do you? What I've found is either too shallow or too abstruse. If you ever have occasion to look at news:sci.physics.strings, you know what I mean by abstruse. There's a site that bills itself as "The Official String Theory Web Site",
http://superstringtheory.com/, but I don't find it entirely satisfying. Too bad Feynman didn't get a chance to make it crystal clear for all of us!
That looks much simpler than the references you can find at
www.physicsweb.org, for instance. No, I don't know of a better site right now. But I do think that string theory is a worth-while topic to investigate.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
