>I agree it is simpler - but are you sure it will be faster? I think the precompiler will simply replace CRLF with chr(13) + chr(10), and the end result will be identical.
>
>>A little simpler and it should execute faster:
>>

>>#DEFINE CRLF CHR(13)+CHR(10)
>>myString - cString1 + CRLF + cString2 + CRLF + cString3
>>

>>
>>Regards,

Borislav, Hilmar,

No, I'm not sure. But that's what I was told back when precompiler directives were added to the language. I believe the concept was that they were compiled as constants and didn't need to be evaluated at run time.

Regards,