Hi Martin,

About 6-7 functions per file (I mean _cursors files, other files have lots of functions). What do you mean by defragmented? My disk is not defragmented, but each of the developers here has programs on the local drive. So far only I and one of my colleagues tried it and we both noticed performance decrease... I'm going to use Coverage profile and then your excellent tool to find out the bottle neck...

But I think it would not be till Wednesday...

>Hi Nadya,
>
>How much procedures,functions and classes are in these prg files?
>Are the last file defragmented?
>
>MartinJ
>
>>This is what we currently have in SET PROCEDURE:
>>
>>C:\MMORTALS\COMMON30\PROGS\UTILITY.FXP, C:\MMORTALS\COMMON30\PROGS\MOVER.FXP, C:\MMORTALS\COMMON30\PROGS\SETUP.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\PROGS\MAIN.FXP, C:\MMORTALS\COMMON30\PROGS\VFPXTAB.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\PROGS\VIEWS.FXP, C:\MMORTALS\COMMON30\LIBS\CACTX.FXP, C:\MMORTALS\COMMON30\PROGS\RS2DBF.FXP, C:\MMORTALS\COMMON30\PROGS\DBF2RS.FXP, C:\MMORTALS\COMMON30\PROGS\DBF2XML.FXP, C:\MMORTALS\COMMON30\PROGS\XML2DBF.FXP, C:\MMORTALS\COMMON30\LIBS\CSESSION.FXP, C:\MMORTALS\COMMON30\LIBS\MSGSVC.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\PROGS\PHI_COLLECTION.FXP, C:\FF605\PROGRAMS\FFNEWOBJ.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\PROGS\FFVISC_UTILS.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\PROGS\ASSIGN_QUEUES.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\PROGS\VISCOLLECT_CURSORS.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\PROGS\VISCOLLECT_OTHERS.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\PROGS\VISCOLLECT_UTILITY.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\CAREMOTE\CA_QUICKSEARCH_R.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\CALOCAL\CA_QUICKSEARCH.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\CALOCAL\CA_SCHEDULED_LETTERS.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\CAREMOTE\CA_SCHEDULED_LETTERS_R.FXP,
>>C:\MMVISCOLLECT\PROGS\ACTIONS_CURSORS.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\PROGS\LETTERS_CURSORS.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\PROGS\INSURANCES_CURSORS.FXP, C:\MMVISCOLLECT\PROGS\TQM_CURSORS.FXP
>>
>>My functions for one particular form are in the last function and I see a performance degradation. What should I do?
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>
>>>>Everything added to set procedure list! Order is important, worse having multiple procedures open at same time there is no way to call a procedure from one of them selectively (I don't know at least - unless you use "do ... in ..." ). You better use classes.
>>>
>>>But the class definitions are searched along the same set proc list <g>...
>>>Clean coding practices or high attention are necessary when dealing whith duplicate names,
>>>regardless of them being class names or function names.
>>>
>>>But it is a nice dirty way to overwrite functions if you know what you are doing
>>>
>>>regards
>>>
>>>thomas