Hi Mike,

Now that's the Mike Beane I remember!,

Thanks,

Ken

>>As I've mentioned before here on the UT, decisons around VFP development are not based on VFP revenue. <
>
>Ken, you mentioned here often enough around the release of VFP 8 that future development efforts were very much linked to revenue. If that impression is implanted in our forebrains, you're the one who put it there.
>
>Unrelated, I want to apologize for my comments to you the other day. Not because they were unfelt but because they were totally uncalled for and unneeded. As the VFP spokesman for Microsoft you are already under assault from all directions and do not need my idle speculation about your 3 a.m.'s of the soul. Probably the only thing worth saying in my message was the one I tossed off in passing, not really appreciating it -- don't judge another man until you've walked in his moccasins. Sorry.
>
>Have a good time at DevCon. And if you should happen to find a cigarette and a blindfold in your speaker's kit, run like hell. LOL
>
>Mike