>>We lost 2 projects because of the problem alone. For us as developers, it does not matter to us, but a lot client are saying that there data are not secured with VFP DBC/Tables that's why they are asking for it.
>
>Jess, I am confused. They didn't give you the project because DBFs weren't secure? Why not, then, use SQL Server as the back end? If security is such an issue for them, it could have been solved that way.
Due to economic concern Menachem. That's the reason why we are asking MS to include Basic Security on VFP DBC/Tables. And we want native VFP data for speed purposes.
JESS S. BANAGA
Project Leader - SDD division
...shifting from VFP to C#.Net
CHARISMA simply means: "Be more concerned about making others feel good about themselves than you are in making them feel good about you."
