Hi, Dragan.

>>>I'd say they are partially wrong. Assume you're comparing two portable radios - one of them has a CD player, and the other has a flashlight. You're comparing them as radios; that's the comparable part. Then you can go and compare how each benefits from the rest of the goodies they have, but you can't really compare those goodies.
>>
>>Why partially wrong?
>
>Because they don't compare the whole product, they're comparing one of its aspects, or one of its components. So while whatever they may find when they compare that component against anything else, they should, in all fairness, say that "VFP is, of course, not just a language, because it also has {the boring list of all the good things gets inserted here and every reader faints}".

Absolutely agreement here. That's in my opinion the most oversighted reason when discussing about a potential VFP.NET implementation.

Best regards,